I observed Angel Rios’s grammar class for Group 2B. The
class began by quickly going over the diagnostic tests that were taken. I
noticed quickly that his approach to teaching was very different from what I
was used to in my foreign language classes. He was really relaxed and the way
class flowed seemed more conversational than traditional lecturing. He was
quick to correct the problems with the test itself admitting when things may
have been misleading and then explaining why the answer is what it is and then
he gave a clearer example. He always wrote examples on the board such as the
verbs to be and to have with all of their conjugations while saying those were
common and irregular verbs so they must be memorized. After 5-10 minutes of
going over the test they started working out of their books.
The book was used more as a guide to the lesson rather than
reading directly out of it. The lesson was about using common English idioms. A
student would read the idiom and then Angel would get different students to
basically try to guess what the meaning was. He would write what they said on
the board and after a few people explained it he would give them the actual
meaning. The students were able to guess them correctly for the most part and
some students shared similar idioms they have at home. For example, an Arabic
idiom translates to it takes two hands to
clap while we have it takes two to
tango. Corrections were really only given for pronunciation errors probably
because even though this was a grammar class, the lesson was focused on
speaking. It was one of their first classes so he definitely didn’t want to make
anyone nervous and lower their effective filter.
Angel Rio's class is a good example of communicative language teaching methods. ESL teachers should minimize lecturing and maximize interactions(teacher-student & student-student)!
ReplyDeleteP.S. Hayley, again, it's called the "affective" filter hypothesis.